SolidJS is a declarative UI library for building web applications, much like React, Angular, or Vue. It is built using brutally efficient fine-grained reactivity(No Virtual DOM), an ephemeral component model, and the full expressiveness of JavaScript(TypeScript) and JSX.

The React. js framework is an open-source JavaScript framework and library developed by Facebook. It's used for building interactive user interfaces and web applications quickly and efficiently with significantly less code than you would with vanilla JavaScript.

It’s not news that Solid and React share almost the same design philosophies, and anyone that has written code in both libraries quickly understands this. Let’s go over what makes Solid and React so similar.

JSX is simply short for “JavaScript XML” and you can think of it as syntactic sugar for writing React or Solid components. This means you can create Solid or React code without JSX using the document.createElement or React.createElement functions, respectively.

JSX allows you to describe what the UI should look like in HTML while giving you the full power of JavaScript. As well as being a visual aid, using JSX in Solid or React is useful for debugging, because it shows more intuitive warnings and error messages.

Both Solid and React are declarative because they update efficiently and render the right components when data changes.

In declarative programming, you only describe the final state of the desired UI and the rendering engine will determine the best way to execute. Declarative components are easier to debug and more readable as opposed to the imperative way of writing code.

Differences between SolidJS and React: Why is SolidJS so fast?

Despite sharing almost the same design philosophies, a few features set both JavaScript libraries apart. We will go over some of those differences in this section.

One of the most striking differences between Solid and React is the absence of a virtual DOM. Contrary to the idea that using the main DOM slows down an application, it is part of what makes Solid so performant.

The virtual DOM is a lightweight implementation of the main DOM. In the past, JavaScript libraries made use of the virtual DOM because it was comparatively faster than the DOM itself. After all, the DOM was not built to handle frequent updates on a large scale, so JavaScript libraries make changes to the virtual DOM and then compare the changes against the real DOM, and merge both.

This is the solution that many libraries and frameworks such as React, Vue.js, and Riot.js use, but today, the creators of Svelte and Solid have described the virtual DOM as pure overhead that only slows down the performance of the library. They have sought out alternate, faster options that include using the real DOM (which beats the rest of the virtual DOM competition).

The way Solid achieves such performant speeds without the use of a virtual DOM is to compile its templates down to real DOM nodes and wrap updates in fine-grained reactions. This way, when your state updates, only the code that depends on it runs.

Components in Solid, unlike React, render just once, and only the JSX expressions and primitives that are being used in the component get updated.

This brings performance gains to Solid as re-rendering a component is not necessary every time it is being used. Solid is reactive enough to track the changes happening inside the component itself.

In this section, we’ll be comparing both libraries based on the below points:

Both Solid and React have great developer experiences. This is because both Solid and React share a few of the same philosophies, such as unidirectional data flow, read/write segregation, and immutable interfaces (except the implementation of a virtual DOM, as we discussed earlier).

Solid also provides first-class JSX and TypeScript support, alongside a few features that are similar to that of React’s, such as context, portals, SSR, hydration, and many more.

In terms of performance, Solid beats React and almost every other JavaScript library out there as the fastest there is.

Don’t get me wrong, React is mighty fast, but its potential is limited by its implementation of a virtual DOM and its quest for clean code architecture.

Hands down, React wins this segment because of its vast ecosystem of third-party UI component libraries, tools, and resources.

At the time of writing, React comes in at over 180k Github Stars and 8.7M weekly npm downloads while Solid comes in at over 13k Github Stars and 11.5k weekly npm downloads.

With regards to third-party libraries, Solid does not have a lot yet, but it does have first-party libraries. Its first-party libraries are the equivalent of other popular libraries in other JavaScript libraries, such as Solid App Router for routing, Solid Testing Library for writing component tests, and Solid Transition Group for animations.

React’s numbers dwarf that of Solid, but we have to take into account the fact that Solid is fairly new to the competition as it was open-sourced in 2018 and now has over 70 contributors. Its growth isn’t staggering, but it is steady.

If you like to get your hands dirty and figure things out yourself, or contribute to the early stage development of a library, then Solid is the one for you.

The number and quality of resources or documentation that exists for a particular framework or library is a result of how established the ecosystem is.

Because React has been around for longer, it has good documentation alongside a vast ecosystem of resources for newbies and advanced developers to follow.

While Solid is fairly new, its creator, Ryan Carniato, is doing a lot of work to put Solid out there by creating videos and blog posts regarding Solid’s development. Members of the community are also creating lots of useful resources and guides on the library. Solid also has proper documentation on its website for newcomers.

In this article, we’ve gone through similarities, differences, and even gone ahead to compare both Solid and React based on developer experience, community, and documentation, among other metrics.

We can see that Solid is doing something right when it comes to performance and developer experience, which are the most important benchmarks. But its biggest hindrance to becoming one of the most used libraries out there is its community and ecosystem.

Let’s face it, most people and corporations will only choose React because of the vast ecosystem and resources that back it up. I mean, there’s an npm package for virtually anything in React. Solid can’t compete with that at this stage, so there’s a lot of work to be done with regards to community building if Solid wants the mass adoption of their library.

So what is the difference between SolidJS and React.js the JavaScript libraries? In this article, we'll uncover the differences between them to enable you to decide which one is the best for your use.

SolidJS vs React.js: Comparing the UI libraries which one is the best in 2022

SwiftUI is a modern framework provided by Apple for building user interfaces across Apple platforms, such as iOS, macOS, watchOS, and tvOS. It offers a wide range of built-in facilities and features that simplify the development of interactive and visually appealing apps. Here are some of the key facilities provided by SwiftUI:

1. Declarative Syntax: SwiftUI uses a declarative syntax, allowing you to describe the user interface and its behavior. Instead of manually manipulating views and their states, you define what your UI should look like based on the current state, and SwiftUI handles the updates automatically.

2. View Composition: SwiftUI encourages the composition of views, making it easy to create complex interfaces by combining smaller, reusable components. Views can be nested and combined in a hierarchical manner, promoting code reusability and maintainability.

3. SwiftUI Controls: SwiftUI offers a rich set of controls and views out of the box, such as buttons, text fields, sliders, pickers, lists, and more. These controls are designed to be easily customizable and adaptable to various styles and appearances.

4. State Management: SwiftUI provides several options for managing and reacting to state changes. You can use @State to create mutable state variables within a view, @Binding to create two-way bindings between views and their parents, and @EnvironmentObject to share data across multiple views using an observable object.

5. Animation: SwiftUI simplifies animation by providing easy-to-use APIs for animating view transitions, property changes, and transitions between different states. You can animate the appearance, position, and size of views with just a few lines of code.

6. Layout and Alignment: SwiftUI includes powerful layout systems that allow you to create adaptive and responsive interfaces. You can use stacks (e.g., HStack, VStack, ZStack) to arrange views horizontally, vertically, or in a layered manner. Alignment guides and spacers help with precise layout control.

7. Dark Mode and Accessibility: SwiftUI has built-in support for Dark Mode, making it easier to create apps that adapt to light and dark color schemes. It also provides accessibility features, including support for Dynamic Type, VoiceOver, and more, ensuring your app can be used by a wide range of users.

8. Gestures and Interactions: SwiftUI offers gesture recognizers that enable you to detect and respond to user interactions, such as taps, swipes, pinches, and rotations. You can attach gestures to views and trigger actions based on user input.

9. Previews and Live Previews: SwiftUI's preview feature allows you to see how your UI looks and behaves in real-time without running the app. You can create previews for different device sizes, orientations, and data states, facilitating rapid prototyping and testing.

10. Integration with Swift: SwiftUI seamlessly integrates with Swift, leveraging the power of the language and its tooling. You can leverage Swift features like type safety, optionals, generics, and functional programming paradigms to write expressive and robust code.

These are just a few of the facilities provided by SwiftUI. The framework continues to evolve, and Apple regularly introduces new features and enhancements to improve the developer experience and empower the creation of innovative user interfaces.

In SwiftUI, you can achieve vertical cell merging in a grid by using the LazyVGrid layout along with the span modifier on grid items. Here's an example of how you can vertically merge cells in a SwiftUI grid:

            ForEach(0..<data.count) { index in

                if index == 1 || index == 7 {

                        .frame(maxWidth: .infinity)

                        .frame(height: 100)

                        .background(Color.blue)

                        .foregroundColor(.white)

                            RoundedRectangle(cornerRadius: 10)

                                .stroke(Color.white, lineWidth: 2)

                        .contentShape(Rectangle())

                        .frame(height: 50)

                        .background(Color.gray)

                        .foregroundColor(.black)

                                .stroke(Color.black, lineWidth: 2)

struct ContentView_Previews: PreviewProvider {

In this code snippet, the data array contains the content of each cell. The LazyVGrid is used with three flexible columns. Inside the ForEach loop, we check if the index corresponds to the cells that need to be merged (in this case, index 1 and index 7). For those cells, we provide a Text view that spans across two columns using the .frame(maxWidth: .infinity) modifier. The merged cells have a different background color, font size, and height compared to the other cells.

You can customize this code snippet according to your specific needs by adjusting the number of columns, the condition for merged cells, and the styling of the cells.

SwiftUI is Apple's declarative framework for building user interfaces with state management, animation, layout, and accessibility features.

uiux

Trending Blogposts on uiux

SolidJS vs React.js: Comparing the UI libraries which one is the best in 2022

How to vertically merge cells in a SwiftUI Grid?

Popular Discussions on uiux

PRODUCTS

QUICK LINKS

LEGAL

uiux

Trending Blogposts on uiux

SolidJS vs React.js: Comparing the UI libraries which one is the best in 2022

How to vertically merge cells in a SwiftUI Grid?

Popular Discussions on uiux